Reducing C02 Emissions and the Potential for Fuel Poverty
Thermal mass, particularly when used as part of a passive solar
design strategy, is increasingly being used to reduce heating and
air conditioning energy consumption and bills. Both benefits are of
interest to housing associations wanting to build sustainable homes
that reduce both their environmental impact and the potential for
fuel poverty.
The ability of thermal mass to reduce overheating problems is
increasingly recognised. Perhaps less appreciated is its ability to
save heating energy when used in passive solar design (PSD).
Consequently, it is possible for concrete, masonry and other
heavyweight dwellings to exploit their inherent thermal mass on a
year-round basis. During the summer, heat is absorbed on hot days,
helping to cool the internal temperature and prevent overheating
problems. The stored heat is then removed by night ventilation.
During the winter, the thermal mass will absorb solar gains through
south facing windows, and slowly releases the heat at night. This
process is effectively the same as that which occurs on summer
nights, the only difference being that during the winter the stored
heat is beneficial, so windows and openings are kept shut to
minimise heat loss. Shutters and blinds used to prevent overheating
in the summer can also help minimise heat loss during the
winter.
Useful levels of thermal mass are found in medium and
heavyweight construction, which in practice is most easily provided
by concrete in the form of blocks and precast or in-situ floors and
panels.
The use of concrete often raises questions regarding its
embodied CO2, which can be slightly higher than that
associated with alternative materials, but in reality the
difference is relatively small when compared to lightweight
systems. And, when you evaluate this in whole-life terms, the
operational CO2 savings provided by the heavyweight
solution is actually much more significant over the
long-term. This point can sometimes be overlooked in the
drive to specify the greenest materials available, but should to
some extent be redressed in the forthcoming revisions to Part L1 of
the Building Regulations, which will take greater account of
thermal mass in the Standard Assessment Procedure (SAP)
calculation.
To establish the facts of embodied versus operational
CO2, The Concrete Centre commissioned research to
examine the embodied and operational CO2 emissions of a
simple semidetached house built using a typical lightweight frame,
with that of several heavyweight versions built using varying
levels of thermal mass. The embodied CO2 for each option
was calculated and thermal modelling was undertaken to see how each
performed across the 21st century, taking account of the likely
impacts of climate change. The results showed that a typical
masonry house with a medium level of thermal mass, has around 4%
more embodied CO2 than an equivalent lightweight frame
construction, but that this could be offset in as little as 11
years due to the energy savings provided by its thermal mass.
Increasing the mass through additional concrete elements, such as
precast upper floors, resulted in a longer offset period, but
ultimately led to the lowest whole life CO2 emissions of
all the options, with a saving in CO2 over the 21st
century approximately six times greater than the difference in its
embodied CO2 when compared to the lightweight frame
solution.
Due to the predicted increase in summer temperatures resulting
from climate change, the lightweight home was found to need
air-conditioning by 2021. This compared with 2041 for the
medium-weight home and 2061 for the medium-heavy and heavyweight
homes.
Thermal mass is of course only one of the steps needed to
adapt homes to a warming climate. Effective ventilation and shading
are also of great importance in all types of housing, particularly
in the south of the UK where overheating is likely to be greatest.
Traditionally, shading has not been a major feature of UK housing.
However, this is likely to change, particularly if tougher
overheating rules appear in the Building Regulations. There are
many shading options, but the most effective at minimising solar
gains are externally located, such as overhangs and louvered
shutters. The latter has the advantage of also providing secure
night time ventilation in the summer.
In addition to having a medium to high level of thermal mass
the key design requirement for capturing solar gains during the
winter is to locate a large proportion of the glazing on the south
elevation, or within about 30° of south. This will allow the low
winter sun to shine directly into the home, passing underneath any
fixed external shading overhangs. There are no hard and fast
rules for window size in passive solar design; the objective is to
optimise solar gains during the winter without incurring summertime
overheating problems. This typically leads to a glazed area that
between approximately 20 and 40% of the façade area. Glazing on the
north façade should be restricted to the minimum area needed for
adequate daylighting, since over the course of a year this will
have a net heat loss.
Incorporating these all design features can help to maximise a
home's year-round passive thermal performance thereby reducing both
CO2 emissions and energy bills.